If you haven't read my first installment "Cimpl Justice" yet, go and read it now
here otherwise this update won't make as much sense.
Update: So we were back in court on 17 January 2014 for a
“Status Hearing,” whatever the heck that is.
Again my court-appointed lawyer was of no use in that he feigned concern
and genuine interest in advocating my position but when it came time for him to
perform, he again disrespected my wishes (he will be handed his walking papers
at the next “Pre-Trial” hearing scheduled to occur on 7 February 2014).
He is so out of touch with the goings on of
this case and refuses to have contact with me until the day of each hearing.
He asked me why I would not allow visitation
between my daughter and her mother, assuming that what he was told by the CPS
worker et al was completely true (an aside: since the black-dress-wearing narcissist
with a god complex forced me to allow the CPS worker into my home, I have taken
steps to protect my daughter and myself by video and audio recording each
encounter according to Wisconsin Statutes
968.31(2)(c)).
I did not try to disallow visitation, I only
expressed several concerns I had with the visitation such as who would
supervise, the time of day, location of the visits, transportation of my
daughter, etc.
Basically, I expressed
that I would prefer that visitation occur as close to home as possible so as to
cut down on travel time to and from the visits and that they occur much earlier
than 6:00 to 8:00 pm considering my daughter’s age and the distance between my
home and the proposed location of the visitation, which would cause her to make
it home after 9:00 pm.
Further, I
expressed that I would prefer that they occurred in my home since my daughter
suffered multiple cases of ring worm the last time her mother got in a position
of mandated supervised visits in a filthy CPS facility.
Next, I absolutely refused to allow my
daughter to visit on my upcoming birthday because plans were made for me to
spend time with BOTH my daughters on my birthday long before my younger
daughter passed away.
Finally, I
expressed that if it will be necessary for my daughter to visit with her mother
in a facility, that I would be the one to transport her to and from the
visitation because of past issues that occurred with the transportation of my
daughter the last time her mother got in a position of mandated supervised
visits.
Of course, everything I said was
twisted, omitted, lifted from context or outright changed and was brought up at
the hearing as “issues” the assistant district attorney had with me.
Some issues that the ADA Heather Miller brought up at
this hearing:
1.
I was not at all going to allow supervised
visits between my daughter and her mother.
2.
I wanted to be present during all contact
between my daughter and her mother.
3.
My insistence on video recording all contact
between the CPS worker and my daughter and me was making the CPS worker “uncomfortable.”
As a result, the fat man in a black dress ordered the
following, completely disregarding
natural law,
Wisconsin statutory law and the
supposed commitment children’s court has to “the best interests of the child”:
1.
Visitations are to occur on Tuesdays and
Thursdays from 6:00 to 8:00 pm beginning on Tuesday 21 January 2014.
2.
I am prohibited from using any electronic
recording device to record interactions between the CPS worker, my daughter and
me on my private property.
In addition, the dress wearing narcissist took no
consideration of my work schedule time to spend with my daughter or plans that
were made long before he and his government goons decided to interfere with our
lives “for my daughter’s protection.” I
asked my attorney to bring up my position and he initially said he wouldn’t but
at my forceful insistence he reluctantly did so. As a result, visitation times changed to 4:00
to 6:00 pm and the pig headed “assonabench” conceded to allow a visit set to
occur on my birthday to be substituted on the following Friday, clearly
demonstrating how UTTERLY USELESS the well placed government mole a.k.a. my
court appointed lawyer is to my position and quite possibly how he is more
interested in garnering favors with the CPS apparatus for future employment
than actually advocating my position.
As of this writing we are still awaiting the final
determination of the Milwaukee County Medical Examiner’s Office for my younger
daughter’s cause of death.
It is
verbalized by the district attorney and CPS repeatedly that the basis for their
involvement is the death of my younger daughter per Wisconsin Statutes
48.13(10m) in addition to her mother’s unbalanced and unstable mental health,
yet they feel perfectly fine with visitation between my daughter and her mother.
Further, the reasons cited in the actual
petition filed with the court initially were pursuant to Wisconsin
48.13(10)
and only recently added 48.13(10m), in my opinion, to show some semblance that
they actually give half a damn about my younger daughter and the circumstances
surrounding her death.
How a judge of the Children’s Court in the Milwaukee
County, Wisconsin circuit has the gall and audacity to think he can order an
individual completely out of his jurisdiction to stop performing a totally
lawful and legal act according to natural law and state statutes simply because
one of his knuckle walking, mouth breathing, room-temperature-I.Q.,
thugocratic
lackeys is “uncomfortable” and feel absolutely justified in doing so can only
be explained by one thing:
Cimpl Justice.